home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: gwu.edu!not-for-mail
- From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu
- Subject: Re: ANSI C and POSIX
- Date: 21 Apr 1996 15:29:38 -0400
- Organization: George Washington University
- Message-ID: <4le2b2$c4t@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
- References: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <4x4tqo2b1d.fsf_-_@bernoulli.enst-bretagne.fr> <4kuc6p$3bt@nntp.Stanford.EDU> <dewar.829628741@schonberg>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.164.9.3
-
- In article <dewar.829628741@schonberg>, Robert Dewar <dewar@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
- >"You still have to buy them from the IEEE. They are reluctant to
- >give them away because document sales pay for a significant
- >portion of IEEE's support for standards."
-
- >To me, this is a terrible way to deal with standards. It is very important
- >to make standards freely available if they are to have maximum impact.
- >This can certainly be achieved, as has been demonstrated by the Ada 95
- >ANSI/ISO standard, which is available freely from the net, and can be
- >copied by anyone without charge.
-
- This issue was discussed at length in an article, followed by a thread
- of letters, in Communications of the ACM (CACM). As I recall, it started
- around the beginning of 1996, maybe a bit earlier.
-
- Anyone interested in this matter ought to read the CACM stuff.
- The pros and cons of using revenue from selling copies of a standard
- are staked out quite well there.
-
- As in so much else these days, everyone wants the benefits of X but
- wants someone else to pay for the X. One reason why it's been easier
- with the Ada standard(s) is that the US government has picked up
- so much of the cost.
-
- I am not taking sides here; read the stuff in CACM, then decide.
-
- Mike Feldman
-